Keywords
Cerita Cinta Enrico
Oedipus
Oedipus complex
Sangkuriang (Tangkuban Perahu)
Categories
How to Cite
Abstract
This article is designed to offer comprehensive analyses of characterizations, plot, setting, intertextual relationships, and hypogram of Cerita Cinta Enrico, the folklore of Sangkuriang (Tangkuban Perahu), and the myth of Oedipus. Qualitative descriptive method is used along with intertextual approach. Based on the analysis of the data, the results are: (1) the three stories analyzed employ the main character as their title; (2) the three of them use the traditional plot and flashback; (3) all of them address Oedipus complex issue; (4) Sangkuriang (Tangkuban Perahu) and Oedipus are the hypograms of Cerita Cinta Enrico.
References
Alfaro, M. J. M. (1996). Intertextuality: Origins and Development of the Concept. Atlantis, 18(1/2), 268–285. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/41054827
Bax, S. (2013). Researching Intertextual Reading. Oxford: Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0353-0490-9
Culler, J. (1976). Presupposition and Intertextuality. MLN, 91(6), 1380–1396. https://doi.org/10.2307/2907142
Encyclopaedia Britannica. (n.d.-a). Oedipus complex: Psychology. In Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/science/Oedipus-complex
Encyclopaedia Britannica. (n.d.-b). Oedipus: Greek mythology. In Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/Oedipus-Greek-mythology
Freud, S. (2010). The Interpretation of Dreams (J. Strachey, Trans.). New York: Basic Books.
Goring, P., Mitchell, D., & Hawthorn, J. (2010). Studying Literature: The Essential Companion (2nd edition). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Jordaan, D. (2016). The intertextual relationship between Augustine’s Confessions and The Letter to the Romans (PhD Thesis, Stellenbosch University). Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch. Retrieved from https://scholar.sun.ac.za/handle/10019.1/100147
Juvan, M. (2008). Towards a History of Intertextuality in Literary and Culture Studies. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.1370
Klarer, M. (2004). An Introduction to Literary Studies. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203414040
Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art (L. S. Roudiez, Ed.). New York, NY: Columbia Univ. Press.
Rahayuni, A. (2013). Semangat Feminis dalam Novel Saman Karya Ayu Utami dan Novel Nayla Karya Djnar Maesa Ayu: Kajian Intertextual (Thesis). Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang.
Riffaterre, M. (1983). Riffaterre: Text Production. New York: Columbia University Press.
Tinneke, H. V. (2006). Sangkuriang: Legenda Gunung Tangkuban Perahu. Bandung: Nuansa Aulia. Retrieved from https://perpustakaan.jakarta.go.id/book/detail?cn=INLIS000000000825647
Tötösy de Zepetnek, S. (1998). Comparative Literature: Theory, Method, Application. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Utami, A. (2012). Cerita Cinta Enrico (Cet. 1). Jakarta: Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.
Wellek, R., & Warren, A. (1970). Theory of Literature. Middlesex, England: Penguin Books. Retrieved from https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=61776
Worton, M. (1990). Intertextuality: Theories and Practice (J. Still, Ed.). Manchester: Manchester Univ Pr.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Resti Maudina Septiani, Rika Handayani (Author)