Language Taboos in Social Activities of the Acehnese Community
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to describe language taboos in the context of social activities within the Acehnese community. The research design employed is field research, utilizing a qualitative approach. The method employed is descriptive-analytical. The data for this research focus on language taboos within the Acehnese community in the Pidie Regency. The data sources are informants, comprising Acehnese individuals residing in the Pidie Regency, spanning three sub-districts, with a total of 21 informants. Data collection involves structured and unstructured interview techniques, supported by the participant observation method with face-to-face conversations and the baiting technique. The data analysis technique used is qualitative analysis with stages such as selection, description, grouping, and data analysis. The research findings reveal language taboos in the social activities of the Acehnese community as follows: (a) language taboos in hunting activities; (b) language taboos in farming activities; (c) language taboos in carpentry activities; (d) language taboos in trading activities; and (e) language taboos in courtship activities.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Duranti, A. (1997). Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810190
Ismawirna, Erfinawati, Junaidi, & Sari, I. J. (2023). Penggunaan Bahasa Tabu dalam Tuturan Bahasa Aceh pada Masyarakat Kecamatan Jeunieb Kabupaten Bireuen. Jurnal Dedikasi Pendidikan, 7(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.30601/dedikasi.v7i1.3379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30601/dedikasi.v7i1.3379
Junaidi, Erfinawati, & Mujiburrahman. (2021). Ragam dan Bentuk Bahasa Slang pada Kelompok Penutur Remaja Berbahasa Aceh di Pidie. Kode: Jurnal Bahasa, 10(4), 205–225. https://doi.org/10.24114/kjb.v10i4.33580.
Junaidi, & Wardani, V. (2019). Konteks Penggunaan Bahasa Tabu Sebagai Pendidikan Etika Tutur dalam Masyarakat Pidie. Jurnal Serambi Ilmu, 20(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.32672/si.v20i1.1001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32672/si.v20i1.1001
Kridalaksana, H. (2013). Kamus Linguistik (Edisi Keempat). Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Laksana, I. K. D. (2009). Tabu Bahasa, Salah Satu Cara Memahami Kebudayaan Bali. Udayana University. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/12971634-tabu-bahasa-salah-satu-cara-memahami-kebudayaan-bali.
Mujiburrahman. (2018). Roles of the Crisis Management Initiative (CMI) in Aceh’s Reconciliation to Strengthen Indonesia’s National Integration After Tsunami in 2005. Journal of Maritime Studies and National Integration, 2(2), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.14710/jmsni.v2i2.4218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jmsni.v2i2.4218
Nazir, Moh. (1998). Metodologi Penelitian. Ghalia Indonesia.
Ningjue, Z. (2010). Taboo language on the Internet: An analysis of genderdifferences in using taboo language [Unpublished BA thesis]. Kristianstad University.
Rahyono, F. X. (2009). Kearifan Budaya dalam Kata. Wedatama Widya Sastra.
Sagitta, A. A. (2017). Hubungan Aktivitas Sosial dengan Kualitas Hidup Lansia di Padukuhan Karang Tengah Nogotirto Gamping Sleman Yogyakarta [Thesis]. Universitas ’Aisyiyah Yogyakarta.
Sumarsono, & Partana, P. (2002). Sosiolinguistik. Sabda Yogyakarta.
Sutarman. (2004). Tabu Bahasa dan Eufemisme. Yuma Pustaka.
Wardani, V. & Nuraiza. (2021). Taboo Words (Haba Geutham) as a Morals in Language and Psychological Effect in Pidie Community. JURNAL SERAMBI ILMU, 22(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.32672/si.v22i1.2478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32672/si.v22i1.2478