Representation of Human Violence Against Nature in Ted Hughes’ Selected Poems
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The existence of nature-themed literary work is not only used as a setting, but also as a critique of how humans treat and behave to nature. The River, The River in March, The Jaguar, Hawk Roosting, To Paint A Water Lily, and Pike are Ted Hughes’ nature-themed poems. This article analyzes human behavior against nature using eco-criticism proposed by Cheryll Glotfelty and applies the concepts of animals and pollution by Greg Garrard as the principle in analyzing these poems. The researchers also reveal messages from the poems about the importance of human consciousness to preserve nature. The result of this study explains that it shows human violence against nature without thinking about its impact on life of people. The human treatment depicted in these poems that reflect human life and natural conditions in England in the 20th century, where many natural disasters and natural damages occurred as the result of human bad behavior against nature. Nature is part of the life of living things and humans are dependent on nature. Therefore, the condition of nature depends on how humans treat nature.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Agustin, S., & Najma, E. (2021). William Faulkner’s Environmental Awareness in His Go Down, Moses. Andalas International Journal of Socio-Humanities (AIJOSH), 3(1), 38–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25077/aijosh.v3i1.18
Alvi, A., Vengadasamy, R., & Majid, A. A. (2019). The Philosophy of Nature in The Poetry of Ghulam Sarwar Yousuf and William Wordsworth: A Comparative Ecocritical Analysis. GEMA: Online Journal of Language Studies, 19(4), 327–345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2019-1904-17
Bandyopadhyay, N. (2013). Ted Hughes and his Animal World: Analysis of the Poems of Ted Hughes by the Yardstick of Eco-Criticism. Galaxy: International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 2(4), 1–6.
Brimblecombe, P., & Bowler, C. (1992). The History of Air Pollution in York, England. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 42(12), 1562–1566. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1992.10467098 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1992.10467098
Chowdhury, F. T. (2019). Ted Hughes’ Poems As The Pessimistic Mirror of Nature. Research Journal of English Language and Literature (RJELAL), 7(1), 122–127.
Fomeshi, B. M., & Khojastehpour, A. (2013). A Poet Builds a Nation: Hafez as a Catalyst in Emerson’s Process of Developing American Literature. E-Journal Petra, 1(2), 109–117.
Garrard, G. (2004). Ecocriticism: The New Critical Idiom. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203644843
Glotfelty, C., & Fromm, H. (1996). The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks In Literary Ecology. University of Georgia Press.
Hayan, F., & Khan, M. A. (2018). Analyzing the Nature of Extropianism in Ted Hughes’ Poetry. International Journal of English and Education, 7(1), 32–40.
İnan, D., & Boldan, M. N. (2018). Ted Hughes’un “Hawk Roosting” Şiirinin Ekoeleştiri ile Okunması. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 21(40), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.31795/baunsobed.492567 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31795/baunsobed.492567
Istiak, A. (2016). Human Animals in Ted Hughes’ Poetry: A Thorough Study of the Animal Poems of Ted Hughes. International Journal of English Language, Literature, and Humanities, 4(5), 1–16.
Kummu, M., Guillaume, J. H. A., de Moel, H., Eisner, S., Flörke, M., Porkka, M., Siebert, S., Veldkamp, T. I. E., & Ward, P. J. (2016). The world’s road to water scarcity: shortage and stress in the 20th century and pathways towards sustainability. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 384–395. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38495 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38495
Mandal, R. A. (2014). Violence in Ted Hughes’ Lupercal: A Reading. International Journal of English Language, Literature & Humanities (IJELLH), 2(8), 396–406.
Morales-Ladrón, M. (2019). The Nurturing River in Nuala Ní Chonchúir’s You: An Ecocritical Reading. ES Review. Spanish Journal of English Studies, 40, 77–95. https://doi.org/10.24197/ersjes.40.2019.77-96 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24197/ersjes.40.2019.77-96
Najma, E. (2019). An Ecological Analysis of Indonesian and American Novels: The Representation of Anarchism and Moral Violence. In Proceeding of The 13th International Conference onMalaysia-Indonesia Relations (PAHMI) (pp. 158–163). Sciendo. https://doi.org/10.2478/9783110680003-030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/9783110680003-030
Pushpalatha, U. (2019). Eco-Critical Approaches in the Poem of Ted Hughes. International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 9(4), 5–9.
Salcedo, H. de la C. (2015). Environmental Violence and Its Consequences. Latin American Perspectives, 42(5), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X15585116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X15585116
Shang, B. (2013). Ethical Criticism and Literary Studies: A Book Review Article about Nie’s Work. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, 15(6), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.2372 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.2372
Stange, G. R. (2016). Matthew Arnold: The Poet as Humanist. Princeton University Press.
Wit, P. (2015). Ted Hughes and Poetry as Spiritual Restitution. Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies, 24(1), 119–132.