Creating a Balance in Bilateral Investment Treaty: A Perspective from Indonesia

Main Article Content

Surya Oktaviandra

Abstract

The previous movement of Government of Indonesia (GOI) to terminate its expiring Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) with many countries does not mean like the end point of rigorous policy. It then leaves a question mark about the legal standing after the concession and how the government establishes a new model to create a balance in BIT. This research is conducted to, firstly, analyze the legal position of government and foreign investor in a terminated BIT. Furthermore, it will discuss how the government can take benefit through learning experience from the previous mistakes in old BITs and the latest development in international investment law. Finally, this study focuses how a balance on BIT can be achieved for both host state and foreign investor. The result of this study shows that the government did not breach any international law procedure in particular by fathoming Vienna Convention on the Law and Treaties and protection for the investor is not diminish immediately due to the existence of survival clause. Further investigation identifies that to obtain a greater benefit following the termination, GOI should develop better balanced provisions in its next BIT model. This effort can be done by taking care of principle of extraterritorial obligation, full protection and security clause, indirect expropriation, and regulatory measure clause, and most importantly how to deal with dispute settlement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Surya Oktaviandra. (2022). Creating a Balance in Bilateral Investment Treaty: A Perspective from Indonesia . Andalas International Journal of Socio-Humanities, 4(1), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.25077/aijosh.v4i1.29
Section
Articles

References

Dixon, M., McCorquodale, R., & Williams, S. (2016). Cases & Materials on International Law (6th ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198727644.001.0001

Dolzer, R., & Schreuer, C. (2012). Principles of International Investment Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Howse, R. (2017, March 7). ICSID Arbitrators Turn Investment Treaty into Insurance Policy Against Terrorism. Retrieved July 25, 2022, from worldtradelaw.typepad.com website: https://worldtradelaw.typepad.com/ielpblog/2017/03/icsid-arbitrators-turn-investment-treaty-into-insurance-policy-against-terrorism.html

HR Standard and Investor Liability in the New Model of Indonesian BITs. (2015, September 9). Retrieved July 25, 2022, from igj.or.id website: https://igj.or.id/hr-standard-and-investor-liability-in-the-new-model-of-indonesian-bits/

Indonesia Sudah Menghentikan 18 BITs. (2015, March 23). Retrieved July 25, 2022, from igj.or.id website: https://igj.or.id/indonesia-sudah-menghentikan-18-bits/

Investment Dispute Settlement: Nusa Tenggara v. Indonesia. (2014). Retrieved July 25, 2022, from investmentpolicy.unctad.org website: https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/investment-dispute-settlement/cases/584/nusa-tenggara-v-indonesia

Investment Policy Hub UNCTAD. Bilateral Investment Treaty: Indonesia & The Netherlands.

Kerner, A. (2009). Why Should I Believe You? The Costs and Consequences of Bilateral Investment Treaties. International Studies Quarterly, 53(1), 73–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2008.01524.x

Miles, K. (2013). The Origins of International Investment Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139600279

Open-Ended Intergovernmental Working Group on Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Respect to Human Rights. (2014, June 26). Retrieved July 25, 2022, from www.ohchr.org website: https://www.ohchr.org/en/hr-bodies/hrc/wg-trans-corp/igwg-on-tnc

Peinhardt, C., & Wellhausen, R. L. (2016). Withdrawing from Investment Treaties but Protecting Investment. Global Policy, 7(4), 571–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12355

Reed, L., Paulsson, J., & Blackaby, N. (2011). Guide to ICSID Arbitration. Washington DC: Kluwer Law International.

Rose-Ackerman, S., & Tobin, J. (2005). Foreign Direct Investment and the Business Environment in Developing Countries: The Impact of Bilateral Investment Treaties. Yale Law & Economics Research Paper No. 293. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.557121

Ruff, D., & Golsong. (2014, March 26). Indonesia to terminate more than 60 bilateral investment treaties. Retrieved July 25, 2022, from www.ft.com website: https://www.ft.com/content/3755c1b2-b4e2-11e3-af92-00144feabdc0

Sornarajah, M. (2021). The International Law on Foreign Investment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316459959

Trakman, L., & Ranieri, N. (2013). Regionalism in International Investment Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195389005.001.0001

UNCTAD. (2016). World Investment Report 2016, Investor Nationality: Policy Challenge. Geneva: UN Publication.

UNCTAD, I. P. H. Bilateral Investment Treaty: Indonesia & China.

UNCTAD, I. P. H. Bilateral Investment Treaty: Indonesia & The United Kingdom.

UNCTAD, I. P. H. India`s BIT Model 2015, (2015). United Nations. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, (2005). Austria.

What is Going on with Indonesia’s Bilateral Investment Treaties? (2016, June 13). Retrieved July 25, 2022, from gbgindonesia.com website: http://www.gbgindonesia.com/en/main/legal_updates/what_is_going_on_with_indonesia_s_bilateral_investment_treaties.php

Yackee, J. W. (2010). Do Bilateral Investment Treaties Promote Foreign Direct Investment? Some Hints from Alternative Evidence. University of Wisconsin Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1114. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1594887